February 26, 2014
Για την Ουκρανία
Αύριο, ένα σχόλιο. Προς το παρόν, συγνώμη στον τακτικό ή περαστικό αναγνώστη - οι δουλειές των συντακτών έτρεχαν τόσο γρήγορα, στη μικροκοσμική τους κλίμακα, όσο τα νερά στις γέφυρες του Δνείπερου. Για μια συνοπτική κρίση, παραπέμπω εδώ.
UPDATE 3/3/2014: Πάντα ασυνεπής... Εκκρεμεί το σχόλιο για το συντομότερο δυνατόν! Μέχρι τότε, μια γεύση από τα μπουμπούκια της νέας κυβέρνησης στην περιοχή του Ντανιέτσκ (τα παρόμοια και στο Χάρκοβο). Σαν τα μπουμπούκια της παλιάς. Επιβεβαιώνεται και πάλι το ιστορικό συμπέρασμα, οτι δεν μπόρεσε ποτέ να υπάρξει «δημοκρατική παλινόρθωση» του καπιταλιστικού καθεστώτος: ο πιο αναίμακτος δρόμος γι αυτό, είναι η επέλαση αρπακτικών ορδών. Πράγμα που θέτει τους όρους και τις προδιαγραφές για τη μελλοντική αντεπίθεση στην οποία οδηγούμαστε - με την ισχύ της ιστορικής νομοτέλειας.
February 21, 2014
Πάρτυ στην Αθήνα
Όπως το ονειρεύεται ο Γρηγόρης Κασιδιάρης - όπως μας το αποκάλυψε ένα αριστερό απόβρασμα, χρόνια πριν.
February 12, 2014
Παραποιημένες φωτογραφίες
Ο Χορστ Ράιχενμπαχ δε δαγκώνει λέμε
Ηνωμένος Τύπος (πρώτος μεταξύ ίσων πρακτορείων)
Πριν:
Μετά:
...αργότερα:
Το πρακτορείο
...και η αποθέωση, από άλλους συναδέλφους:
Ως είθισται, η σχετική είδηση αναπαράχθηκε αφειδώς από μπλόγκερς που δεν κάνουν τίποτα να κρύψουν τη δική τους επίμονη ασθένεια.
February 11, 2014
ŽIVEO NARODNI USTANAK U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI!
Od: Nova komunistička partija Jugoslavije (NKPJ), Savez komunistička omladine Jugoslavije (SKOJ) i Studentski front (SF)
Najpre, pozdraljamo hrabru, predanu i požrtvovanu borbu radnika u Tuzli. Radnici i omladino Tuzle , već smo pisali da vaše borba, ukoliko opstane i istraje, može pokrenuti čitavu BiH. Pisali smo da je njen prvenstveni cilj sve veće udruživanje naroda i čvršća povezanost radničke klase čitave Bosne i Hercegovine. Bilo je neophodno da čitava BiH stane iza vas kako bi vaša borba urodila plodom. Do progresivnih promena na nivou vašeg grada može doći jedino ako ih bude na nivou čitave zemlje. Vi ste taj zadatak ispunili. Još jednom ste se dokazali kao najborbeniji deo naroda naše domovine Jugoslavije. Pokazali ste da čvrsto sledite onu odvažnost i hrabrost kakvu su imali inicijatori i učesnici slavne „Husinske bune“. Sada ishod vaše borbe zavisi od ishoda borbe čitavog naroda Bosne i Hercegovine.
Narode Bosne i Hercegovine , vi ste danas ustali protiv svoje pro-imperijalističke buržoaske vlade, protiv sistema i državnog kursa koga ona zastupa. Taj sistem je varvarski kapitalizam koji je za sobom ostavio stravičnu bedu i pustoš. Od presudnog je značaja da ga prepoznate kao takvog, i jasno poručite da se borite protiv njega. Reuspostavljanje kapitalizma na prostoru naše socijalističke domovine Jugoslavije, inicirano, organizovano i pomagano od strane imperijalističkih sila dovelo je do očajne situacije u kojoj se nalazimo. Vi se danas borite za svoje materijalne interese, ti interesi direktno su suprotstavljeni interesima vladajuće klase, predstavnicima kapitlizma – novoformiranoj buržoaziji. Ona se formirala iz redova onih koji su rasprodali narodnu imovinu, opljačkali privredu, izdali interese naroda cepajući ga i gurajući u besmislen rat za interese zapadnog imperijalizma, na kome su profitirali kako oni tako i strain kapitalisti.
Vi ste već pokazali visoki stepen socijalne svesti time što ste naglasili da se borite protiv buržoaske demokratije a za narodnu demokratiju. Time što ste odbili „podršku“ raznoraznih buržoaskih stranaka i svoju borbu okarakterisali kao radničku. Čestitamo vam na tome! Sada je važno da se socijalna svest dalje razvije i izgradi u socijalističku svest. U svest o tome kako i čime zameniti postojeći sistem. Socijalizam je ne samo alternativa već jedini put za prevazilaženje kapitalizma i njegovog nehumanog produkta – siromaštva radničke klase, njenog izrabljivanja od stane kapitalista prisvajanjem profita i otuđenjem proizvoda rada. Sada je vreme da se širom Bosne gromoglasno ori: „Smrt kapitalizmu! Živela narodna socijalistička revolucija!“
Pisali smo, takođe, da radničku pobunu u Tuzli pored cele BiH, prati i čitav prostor bivše Jugoslavije - naše jedine domovine, i pozivali na solidarnost i podršku toj borbi. Pozdravljamo sve sindikate i radničke organizacije širom bivše Jugoslavije koje su podržale borbu radničke klase u Tuzli i pozivamo ih da nastave sa podrškom. Pozdravljamo rad svih pro-jugoslovenskih grupa na društvenim mrežama koji predano prate, podržavaju i omogućavaju dostupnost informacija o događajima u Tuzli i širom Bosne te i na taj način stvaraju sve veću povezanost radnog naroda s našeg prostora. Sada kada je borba radnika u Tuzli prerasla u narodni ustanak, čitava bivša Jugoslavija budno prati dešavanja u BiH. Kao što uspeh borbe tuzlanskih radnika zavisi od borbe čitavog naroda BiH, tako i uspeh borbe BiH zavisi od toga da li će biti i drugih svenarodnog ustanka u regionu. Uspeh progresivnih promena na nivou BiH, biće moguć samo ukoliko dođe do progresivnih promena u čitavom okruženju, prvenstveno u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, što će dalje stvoriti odličnu platformu za progres na čitavom Balkanu.
Upozorili smo, takođe, i na kontra udar reakcionarnih i pro-buržuaskih snaga koji će uslediti i koji je usledio. On se ogleda u tome što razne buržoaske stranke pokušavaju profitirati na vašoj borbi. Razne vas nacionalističke snage u službi imperijalističkog kapitalizma pokušavaju podeliti i razdvojiti, time oslabiti i razoružati vašu borbu.
Narodi Bosne i Hercegovine – recite im odlučno NE! Podele su uzrok vašeg nezadovoljstva, one su uzrok očajnog materijalnog položaja u kome se nalazite. One su uzrok propasti najširih slojeva stanovništva Jugoslavije. Na podelama su profitirali samo korumpirani prokapitalistički političari, raznorazni „biznismeni“ i tajkuni, ratni profiteri i privatnici - predstavnici buržoaske klase. Vas su zatvorili u nacionalne torove a sebi sazidali dvorove, rasprodali narodnu imovinu, opljčkali privredu, razorili industriju i poljoprivredu a zdravstvo i školstvo učinili privilegijom bogatih.
Sada je vreme da dokažete narodno jedinstvo, da pokažete odlučnost i istrajnost. To ste u izvesnoj meri već pokazali time što su u vašoj pravednoj borbi udružena sva tri naroda koja žive u Bosni i Hercegovini i time što stalno pozivate na jedinstvo. Time ste na ispravnom putu jer pozivate u pomoć i radni narod drugih republika bivše Jugoslavije. Međutim, od presudnog je značaja da pokažete još veće jedinstvo time što ćete odlučno i ponosno stati pod jedinstvenu zastavu Bosne i Harcegovine. Ne postojeću državnu zastavu, pod njome se nikada nećete ujediniti, ona je simbol podeljenosti i imperijalističke okupacije zemlje. Već narodnu zastavu slavne i ponosne Socijalističke Republike Bosne i Hercegovine. Tom zastavom reći ćete bez ijedne reči sve ono što želite da kažete. Njena crvena boja označava radničku – proletersku borbu, to je simbol vaše trenutne borbe. Umanjena zastava Jugoslavije u njenom gornjem levom uglu simbol je narodnog jedinstva Bosne i Hercegovine i dostojni reprezent onoga što BiH u svojoj suštini jeste – Jugoslavija u malom. Pozivamo učesnike protesta širom BiH, da na ulice izađu sa ovim i drugim simbolima proleterske borbe u prvom redu crvenim zastavama i zastavom Jugoslavije. To je korak koji se sa nestrpljenjem očekuje i koji će biti inicijator ustanka radnog naroda protiv nepravde u svim ostalim jugoslovenskim republikama. Pokažite da se dosledno borite za interese radničke klase, za svoje interese.
NKPJ, SKOJ i Studentski front će dati svoj doprinos u vašoj pravednoj borbi, i već ovih dana će organizovati protestne akcije u znak solidarnosti sa radničkom klasom Bosne i Hercegovine. Pozdravljamo one sindikate policije koji su odličili da stanu na stranu radnika i prekinu sramnu službu čizmi pro-imperijalističkog kapitalističkog režima. Osuđujemo sve one koji to nisu učinili a vrše nasilje nad radnicima, penzionerima, studentima, učenicima i svim učesnicima u protestu.
NKPJ, SKOJ i SF nastavljaju podršku radničkom ustanku u Bosni i Hercegovini i pozivaju na ujedinjenje u okviru avangardne komunističke partije kakva je NKPJ, koja se bori za vlast radničke klase – za socijalizam!
NKPJ, SKOJ i SF nastavljaju da podržavaju i učestvuju u borbi radničke klase širom Jugoslavije. Mira, slobode i pravde nema bez uništenja kapitalizma.
Živeo ustanak radničke klase Bosne i Hercegovine!
Živela borba radnog naroda Jugoslavije protiv eksploatacije i imperijalizma!
Sekretarijat Nove komunističke partije Jugoslavije
Sekretarijat Saveza komunističke omladine Jugoslavije
Sekretarijat Studentskog fronta
Beograd 7. februar 2014.
Najpre, pozdraljamo hrabru, predanu i požrtvovanu borbu radnika u Tuzli. Radnici i omladino Tuzle , već smo pisali da vaše borba, ukoliko opstane i istraje, može pokrenuti čitavu BiH. Pisali smo da je njen prvenstveni cilj sve veće udruživanje naroda i čvršća povezanost radničke klase čitave Bosne i Hercegovine. Bilo je neophodno da čitava BiH stane iza vas kako bi vaša borba urodila plodom. Do progresivnih promena na nivou vašeg grada može doći jedino ako ih bude na nivou čitave zemlje. Vi ste taj zadatak ispunili. Još jednom ste se dokazali kao najborbeniji deo naroda naše domovine Jugoslavije. Pokazali ste da čvrsto sledite onu odvažnost i hrabrost kakvu su imali inicijatori i učesnici slavne „Husinske bune“. Sada ishod vaše borbe zavisi od ishoda borbe čitavog naroda Bosne i Hercegovine.
Narode Bosne i Hercegovine , vi ste danas ustali protiv svoje pro-imperijalističke buržoaske vlade, protiv sistema i državnog kursa koga ona zastupa. Taj sistem je varvarski kapitalizam koji je za sobom ostavio stravičnu bedu i pustoš. Od presudnog je značaja da ga prepoznate kao takvog, i jasno poručite da se borite protiv njega. Reuspostavljanje kapitalizma na prostoru naše socijalističke domovine Jugoslavije, inicirano, organizovano i pomagano od strane imperijalističkih sila dovelo je do očajne situacije u kojoj se nalazimo. Vi se danas borite za svoje materijalne interese, ti interesi direktno su suprotstavljeni interesima vladajuće klase, predstavnicima kapitlizma – novoformiranoj buržoaziji. Ona se formirala iz redova onih koji su rasprodali narodnu imovinu, opljačkali privredu, izdali interese naroda cepajući ga i gurajući u besmislen rat za interese zapadnog imperijalizma, na kome su profitirali kako oni tako i strain kapitalisti.
Vi ste već pokazali visoki stepen socijalne svesti time što ste naglasili da se borite protiv buržoaske demokratije a za narodnu demokratiju. Time što ste odbili „podršku“ raznoraznih buržoaskih stranaka i svoju borbu okarakterisali kao radničku. Čestitamo vam na tome! Sada je važno da se socijalna svest dalje razvije i izgradi u socijalističku svest. U svest o tome kako i čime zameniti postojeći sistem. Socijalizam je ne samo alternativa već jedini put za prevazilaženje kapitalizma i njegovog nehumanog produkta – siromaštva radničke klase, njenog izrabljivanja od stane kapitalista prisvajanjem profita i otuđenjem proizvoda rada. Sada je vreme da se širom Bosne gromoglasno ori: „Smrt kapitalizmu! Živela narodna socijalistička revolucija!“
Pisali smo, takođe, da radničku pobunu u Tuzli pored cele BiH, prati i čitav prostor bivše Jugoslavije - naše jedine domovine, i pozivali na solidarnost i podršku toj borbi. Pozdravljamo sve sindikate i radničke organizacije širom bivše Jugoslavije koje su podržale borbu radničke klase u Tuzli i pozivamo ih da nastave sa podrškom. Pozdravljamo rad svih pro-jugoslovenskih grupa na društvenim mrežama koji predano prate, podržavaju i omogućavaju dostupnost informacija o događajima u Tuzli i širom Bosne te i na taj način stvaraju sve veću povezanost radnog naroda s našeg prostora. Sada kada je borba radnika u Tuzli prerasla u narodni ustanak, čitava bivša Jugoslavija budno prati dešavanja u BiH. Kao što uspeh borbe tuzlanskih radnika zavisi od borbe čitavog naroda BiH, tako i uspeh borbe BiH zavisi od toga da li će biti i drugih svenarodnog ustanka u regionu. Uspeh progresivnih promena na nivou BiH, biće moguć samo ukoliko dođe do progresivnih promena u čitavom okruženju, prvenstveno u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, što će dalje stvoriti odličnu platformu za progres na čitavom Balkanu.
Upozorili smo, takođe, i na kontra udar reakcionarnih i pro-buržuaskih snaga koji će uslediti i koji je usledio. On se ogleda u tome što razne buržoaske stranke pokušavaju profitirati na vašoj borbi. Razne vas nacionalističke snage u službi imperijalističkog kapitalizma pokušavaju podeliti i razdvojiti, time oslabiti i razoružati vašu borbu.
Narodi Bosne i Hercegovine – recite im odlučno NE! Podele su uzrok vašeg nezadovoljstva, one su uzrok očajnog materijalnog položaja u kome se nalazite. One su uzrok propasti najširih slojeva stanovništva Jugoslavije. Na podelama su profitirali samo korumpirani prokapitalistički političari, raznorazni „biznismeni“ i tajkuni, ratni profiteri i privatnici - predstavnici buržoaske klase. Vas su zatvorili u nacionalne torove a sebi sazidali dvorove, rasprodali narodnu imovinu, opljčkali privredu, razorili industriju i poljoprivredu a zdravstvo i školstvo učinili privilegijom bogatih.
Sada je vreme da dokažete narodno jedinstvo, da pokažete odlučnost i istrajnost. To ste u izvesnoj meri već pokazali time što su u vašoj pravednoj borbi udružena sva tri naroda koja žive u Bosni i Hercegovini i time što stalno pozivate na jedinstvo. Time ste na ispravnom putu jer pozivate u pomoć i radni narod drugih republika bivše Jugoslavije. Međutim, od presudnog je značaja da pokažete još veće jedinstvo time što ćete odlučno i ponosno stati pod jedinstvenu zastavu Bosne i Harcegovine. Ne postojeću državnu zastavu, pod njome se nikada nećete ujediniti, ona je simbol podeljenosti i imperijalističke okupacije zemlje. Već narodnu zastavu slavne i ponosne Socijalističke Republike Bosne i Hercegovine. Tom zastavom reći ćete bez ijedne reči sve ono što želite da kažete. Njena crvena boja označava radničku – proletersku borbu, to je simbol vaše trenutne borbe. Umanjena zastava Jugoslavije u njenom gornjem levom uglu simbol je narodnog jedinstva Bosne i Hercegovine i dostojni reprezent onoga što BiH u svojoj suštini jeste – Jugoslavija u malom. Pozivamo učesnike protesta širom BiH, da na ulice izađu sa ovim i drugim simbolima proleterske borbe u prvom redu crvenim zastavama i zastavom Jugoslavije. To je korak koji se sa nestrpljenjem očekuje i koji će biti inicijator ustanka radnog naroda protiv nepravde u svim ostalim jugoslovenskim republikama. Pokažite da se dosledno borite za interese radničke klase, za svoje interese.
NKPJ, SKOJ i Studentski front će dati svoj doprinos u vašoj pravednoj borbi, i već ovih dana će organizovati protestne akcije u znak solidarnosti sa radničkom klasom Bosne i Hercegovine. Pozdravljamo one sindikate policije koji su odličili da stanu na stranu radnika i prekinu sramnu službu čizmi pro-imperijalističkog kapitalističkog režima. Osuđujemo sve one koji to nisu učinili a vrše nasilje nad radnicima, penzionerima, studentima, učenicima i svim učesnicima u protestu.
NKPJ, SKOJ i SF nastavljaju podršku radničkom ustanku u Bosni i Hercegovini i pozivaju na ujedinjenje u okviru avangardne komunističke partije kakva je NKPJ, koja se bori za vlast radničke klase – za socijalizam!
NKPJ, SKOJ i SF nastavljaju da podržavaju i učestvuju u borbi radničke klase širom Jugoslavije. Mira, slobode i pravde nema bez uništenja kapitalizma.
Živeo ustanak radničke klase Bosne i Hercegovine!
Živela borba radnog naroda Jugoslavije protiv eksploatacije i imperijalizma!
Sekretarijat Nove komunističke partije Jugoslavije
Sekretarijat Saveza komunističke omladine Jugoslavije
Sekretarijat Studentskog fronta
Beograd 7. februar 2014.
January 26, 2014
January 06, 2014
Anatomy of a lobotomy
From the "Pacific Side". Published on 4/1/2014
120 Dogs: Chinese Satirist's Tweet Takes All English News Media For A Ride
On 11 December 2013 at 02:38:07 UTC, the China-based online satirist personality known as Pyongyang Choi Seongho (or someone posing as him/her) posted a tweet to his/her Tencent Weibo account describing in detail how Kim Jongun had his uncle Jang Songtaek devoured by ravenous dogs. The original tweet can be seen here:http://t.qq.com/p/t/312572016688539
The page features a background image of cartoon Kim Jongun giving the middle finger to his people from a balcony while flanked by senior officers. Given that the username is "choiseongho000", it's also likely this is simply a copycat account mooching off Pyongyang Choi Seongho's good name. One example of his/her style is this amusing tweet posted on U.S. Thanksgiving Day that says, "Today is Thanksgiving Day. Thanksgiving Day is the day for giving thanks to Kim Jongun. The American people eat turkey to thank him. What do you people eat?" It also includes a poster of Kim Jongun in sunglasses saying, "Don't know how to be thankful, then you'll get shot."
http://t.qq.com/p/t/310283022424717
More can be read about the Pyongyang Choi Seongho phenomenon at the links below:
http://beijingcream.com/2012/12/writer-choi-seongho-sina-weibo-star-dprk-patriot-brilliant-satirist/
http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20130418000086&cid=1103
http://www.theworldofchinese.com/article/weibos-premier-sino-satirists/
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/775419.shtml
Even in China and North Korea it would still have been the morning of December 11 when the tweet was posted. The following day on December 12, the Wen Wei Po news source in Hong Kong published an article quoting the tweet word-for-word:
http://news.wenweipo.com/2013/12/12/IN1312120039_2.htm
A screenshot of the original tweet was included with the article on Wen Wei Po. The article also cites Pyongyang Choi Seongho by name as the original source. In addition to describing how Jang Songtaek and five accomplices were stripped naked, thrown in a cage, and fed to 120 wild dogs, the article also describes how Kim Jongun removed his uncle from power for supporting his exiled oldest brother Kim Jongnam in a potential power grab. It also says that no one else had the guts to arrest his uncle so they had to have Kim's second oldest brother Kim Jongchul come out of the woodwork to personally arrest him before fading back into obscurity because he'd be perceived as a threat himself if he actually tried to hold a senior government post. The Wen Wei Po article must have sounded plausible enough for the Straits Times in Singapore to publish the first piece in English on it on December 24:
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/asia-report/china/story/jangs-execution-bodes-ill-china-20131224
From there, the story snowballed across the mainstream English news media and it still seems to have momentum. Major English news outlets from the U.S. to the UK to India to Russia have been publishing the report:
https://www.google.com/search?q=north+korea+dogs&tbm=nws
Several have also taken a more cautious approach to the story, citing analysts and experts, but still all missing the obvious fact that the original source of the Wen Wei Po story was a tweet from a known satirist or someone posing as him/her:
http://www.nknews.org/2014/01/rumor-jang-song-thaek-was-killed-by-hungry-dogs-re-emerges/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/01/03/no-kim-jong-un-probably-didnt-feed-his-uncle-to-120-hungry-dogs/
http://www.businessinsider.com/jang-song-taek-really-eaten-by-dogs-2014-1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-echochambers-25597324
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100252705/did-north-koreas-kim-jong-un-kill-his-uncle-with-120-starving-dogs/
It's amusing that given our faith in modern global news media to get to the bottom of a story, no one has actually gone back to the Wen Wei Po article and caught this. All analysis in the swaths of content that have been devoted to this report since it came out stops abruptly at a linguistic wall between the English language Straits Times story and the Chinese language Wen Wei Po article.
What do I take away from this? One, I'm reminded that language is always a barrier. Nowadays I think we imagine that global news organizations probably have multilingual experts from a wide variety of backgrounds covering all the bases. Maybe that's not the case. The ability of any one party to navigate fluidly across linguistic barriers will always be an advantage. Two, many Chinese news providers do sometimes play a little bit fast and loose with their sources when there is something that backs a viewpoint they support. Regardless of whether the tweet's content was true or false or whether the writer was aware of the source's reputation as a known satirist, Wen Wei Po saw it as something worth legitimizing. If Wen Wei Po is a government mouthpiece as some of the articles have said, then maybe that is telling. Or maybe not.
November 27, 2013
November 02, 2013
October 12, 2013
Dos criaturas del imperialismo estadounidense
Capriles y Yoani Sánchez: criaturas de la CIA
En mi entrega anterior
argumenté el acierto del presidente Maduro al expulsar de Venezuela a
Kelly Keiderling Franz, encargada de la embajada yanqui en Caracas.
Keiderling, oficial de caso (case officer) de la CIA a cargo del agente Henrique Capriles Radonsky había hecho la misma función en La Habana respecto al escritor Raúl Capote, el oficial Daniel de la seguridad cubana –y no David como erróneamente escribí debido a la premura periodística– quien, revelada su identidad, hizo públicas las verdaderas actividades de la
diplomática.
El caso de Capriles Radonsky muestra cómo la CIA, en la guerra contra nuestros pueblos, engendra criaturas cuya verdadera personalidad nada tiene que ver con la imagen estereotipada por la abrumadora red de medios de difusión dominantes.
Millonario por ambas ramas familiares, propietarias de cadenas de medios de difusión y de cine así como de negocios inmobiliarios, y por ello muy influyentes políticamente, aunque no sabe lo que es trabajar para ganarse la vida, fue electo diputado y presidente de la Cámara de Diputados de la IV Republica a los 25 años sin tener antecedentes políticos, salvo pertenecer a la organización de ultraderecha Tradición, familia y propiedad. Debido a eso también llegó a gobernador del estado de Miranda, donde reside una gran concentración de clase media enajenada que lo religió.
Sin embargo, la CIA ha creado el espejismo de un Capriles líder popular de apariencia modesta, austera y hablar campechano. Le ha puesto especialistas en mercadotecnia electoral, que le han indicado calarse la gorra de pelotero y vestirse con ropa deportiva todo el tiempo, imitando precisamente el estilo de Hugo Chávez. La central de inteligencia ha entregado generosos fondos a su partido Primero Justicia a través del National Endowmente for Democracy, su brazo financiero. El trato cómplice a Capriles de CNN en español –empresa del pulpo Time-Warner– hasta el punto que el día de su derrota electoral por Maduro uno de sus conductores le dictaba descaradamente las respuestas que debía dar, muestra cómo se sostiene su falsa imagen.
No son casuales su proclamada identificación con Lula, aunque este afirmara que Chávez era su candidato, ni sus promesas de mantener las misiones chavistas, pese a que su verdadero programa de gobierno consiste en privatizar las empresas estatales, entregar el petróleo a Estados Unidos y aplicar un despiadado programa neoliberal. Nada nuevo, Hitler también usó el rojo de socialistas y comunistas, llamó socialista al partido nazi y reivindicó el 1º de mayo.
Algo semejante ocurre con la bloguera Yoani Sánchez, presentada como
activista socialpero en realidad golden girl de la contrarrevolución de Miami, homenajeada en esa ciudad por los más feroces enemigos de la revolución cubana como los veteranos de la invasión a Cuba por Bahía de Cochinos, el Consejo por la Libertad de Cuba (varios de cuyos miembros son terroristas) y legisladores cubanoestadunidenses como la cavernícola y sionista Ileana Ross-Lehtinen. Corresponsal de El País en Cuba con un salario de 2000 euros mensuales y vicepresidenta de la patronal Sociedad Interamericana de Prensa, brazo mediático del Pentágono y la CIA, donde recibe otro salariazo, su trayectoria no registra actividad a favor de causa social alguna. Convidada a México por la Coparmex, ¿puede alguien medianamente enterado creer que los impulsores de las privatizaciones, los impuestos para los pobres, la represión de la protesta social y el crecimiento cero, van a traer de conferencista de lujo a su foro de Acapulco a una verdadera luchadora social?
Otro tanto puede decirse respecto a la invitación de Sánchez a la reunión de
las mentes más brillantes del planetapatrocinada, por cierto, por empresas tan
socialmente responsablescomo Monsanto, Coca-Cola, Samsung y medios tan creíbles como Televisa, Forbes y Newsweek.
El blog y la cuenta en Twitter de la señora crecieron como la espuma. En cuestión de un año su cuenta tenía 214 mil seguidores y el blog, alojado en un sitio misterioso fuera de Cuba, aparecía en 18 idiomas. Esto en un país cuyo acceso a Internet está sujeto a enormes limitaciones tecnológicas debido al bloqueo yanqui. Recibió además el premio Ortega y Gasset y muchos otros con los que ha acumulado más de 250 mil euros. Viaja por el mundo a toda leche y gasta 300 mil euros anuales en tuitear. ¿Quién paga la factura?
Angel Guerra Cabrera
October 04, 2013
Haircut
Μετά το γενναίο haircut στον ελληνικό χιτλεροφασισμό που παρακολουθήσαμε σε ζωντανή ραδιοτηλεοπτική μετάδοση (η μονίμως παραλειπόμενη σύνδεση με τα προηγούμενα εδώ), θα επακολουθήσει ως είθισται επανακεφαλαιοποίησις των μετόχων οργάνων ταξικής καταστολής/εξουσίας (πολιτικό σύστημα, ΜΜΕ, εν γένει συμφυόμενη με την άρχουσα τάξη κρατική εξουσία). Ενδέχεται οι αντίστοιχες ανάγκες να μην είναι τόσο μεγάλες. Μείνετε συντονισμένοι.
October 01, 2013
September 15, 2013
Chile, once de Septiembre: imperialism teaches II
Indeed the nationalization process went on – within the existing bourgeois legal framework; more precisely, it had been based on a law passed since 1932, which typically had not been abolished, though it remained inactive and unknown even to most of lawyers.
Many more successes could be reported from the very first period of UP’s administration, such as
Other worth-to-mention successes of UP’s government action, include
Such changes could be read as a vast capitalist modernization program; however, from the ruling class point of view, they were a clear sign of threat to its class interests. For the domestic bourgeoisie it was too risky to bet on some internal dynamics of fading UP’s action out. For imperialists, the issue was explosive, as Chile could show that peoples’ social liberation can happen without being drowned in blood. So they needed to counterattack – as they had done, following an elaborate, multilevel action plan.
The first objective was to overthrow UP from government.
Some major points of this plan become known as it started to get implemented:
During the same period, Chile, despite renegotiations with foreign creditors, was forced to pay every year 200 million U.S. dollars for external debt payments.
Thus, in the last months of 1971, approximately one year after the election of Allende, the results of this pressure had become visible in Chile’s economy and finances: rise in the cost of living, problems in the supply of products and recession. But the forces of UP, or at least the majority of them, were still having illusions about the possibilities for the government to tackle the economic crisis and the attack of big capital and imperialism, while the country was being kept inside the capitalist framework; they were not politically conscient that there was just one problem behind anything else, and that this problem was getting always more urgent and crucial to solve. "Which class has the power" is a condensed statement for this problem.
UP’s government had tried to cope with the difficult situation by increasing taxation of the wealthy classes in order to increase state revenue. At the same time, they also appealed on workers for increasing production and productivity of labor.
Many more successes could be reported from the very first period of UP’s administration, such as
- the significant rise of the real income of workers,
- the fall of unemployment from 8.8 % to 3 % and of infant mortality by 20,1 %. For the first time in the history of the country a universal health care system had been created.
Other worth-to-mention successes of UP’s government action, include
- spectacular progress in the field of literacy and public education;
- expropriation of important latifundia, giving land to thousands of farmers;
- reforestation of 600.000 acres;
- foundation of farm cooperatives that began to change life in the village;
- significant improvement of the situation of natives (“indios”).
Such changes could be read as a vast capitalist modernization program; however, from the ruling class point of view, they were a clear sign of threat to its class interests. For the domestic bourgeoisie it was too risky to bet on some internal dynamics of fading UP’s action out. For imperialists, the issue was explosive, as Chile could show that peoples’ social liberation can happen without being drowned in blood. So they needed to counterattack – as they had done, following an elaborate, multilevel action plan.
The first objective was to overthrow UP from government.
Some major points of this plan become known as it started to get implemented:
- creating a chaotic situation: this meant systematic paralysis of state institutions, economic sabotage, boycotts, support and reinforcement of fascist gags, for organizing assassinations and spreading terrorism.
- economy war at the international level: credit restrictions from international and above all the American banks, embargo in copper trading and petrol supply, measures to cause insolvency by currency restrictions, withdrawal of commercial agreements for U.S. exports, especially on copper mining technology and other means of production.
During the same period, Chile, despite renegotiations with foreign creditors, was forced to pay every year 200 million U.S. dollars for external debt payments.
Thus, in the last months of 1971, approximately one year after the election of Allende, the results of this pressure had become visible in Chile’s economy and finances: rise in the cost of living, problems in the supply of products and recession. But the forces of UP, or at least the majority of them, were still having illusions about the possibilities for the government to tackle the economic crisis and the attack of big capital and imperialism, while the country was being kept inside the capitalist framework; they were not politically conscient that there was just one problem behind anything else, and that this problem was getting always more urgent and crucial to solve. "Which class has the power" is a condensed statement for this problem.
UP’s government had tried to cope with the difficult situation by increasing taxation of the wealthy classes in order to increase state revenue. At the same time, they also appealed on workers for increasing production and productivity of labor.
TO BE CONTINUED
September 11, 2013
Chile, once de Septiembre: imperialism teaches I
The mighty tentative of social liberation using – if not religiously respecting – the control mechanisms enforcing the bourgeois State power, which took place in Chile, yields today in the light of the accumulated historic experience of the four decades passed since Pinochet’s Coup, some bitter yet precious truths.
Let us recall some basics of what is often called the “Chile’s experiment”.
The UNIDAD POPULAR had been created on the initiative of the Communist Party of Chile in 1969. It also comprised the Socialist Party, the Radical Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Popular Unitary Action Movement (MAPU) – since 1972 the MAPU Obrero Campesino (fields laborers) splinter group too – and the Independent Popular Action . Also, since 1971 the Christian Left Party. It initially included the moderate Party of the Radical Left, that later joined opposition. Here you can find what the UP’s founding Pact was like. UP has been also supported by the Central Única de Trabajadores, a National Workers’ Syndicate.
The leader of the UP was Salvador Allende, a social democrat politician, founding member of the Socialist Party of Chile. Allende had declared that UP struggles for an anti-imperialist, anti-oligarchic government that would replace the House and Senate with a Democratic National Congress. He had been committed to undertaking a large-scale land reform against big landlords and to nationalizing all foreign firms and banks, including the huge U.S. investments in the extremely important for the Chilean economy sector of copper mining.
This program wasn’t meant to challenge capitalist ownership in general; it was meant to be applied by a bourgeois government, under capitalist rule. Nowadays the point mark of this last sentence is only holding the place where ellipsis should be standing…
The stake was a social-democratic one, in the old sense of the term: take the elections, apply radical reforms, get support at international level by the socialist movement, and gradually manage to put the foundations for a sustainable, truly democratic and socialist society.
The Communist Party of Chile abandonned its political autonomy, by passing its action exclusively through the thousands of base committees of the UP, where members of all parties of the Front were participating along with masses of people outside parties and decisions had to be unanimous. The converse is also true: the CPC had insisted on subordinating any social struggle and movement to the formal political agreement in the framework of UP’s organizations.
On September 4 1970, in the first round of the Presidential Elections, the UP got 36,3 % of the vote versus 34,9 % of its adversary. According to the Chilean Constitution, the Congress had to elect the President between the two candidates that led the vote. Yankees were already worried and thinking about alternatives. On October 5 1970, Allende, with the Christian Democrats having voted for him, got 271 votes out of 462, not enough to be elected.
At the same time, a multi-facet operation for terrorizing the people was being settled:
on 22 October the Chief of Staff, Rene Schneider had been assassinated by fascist gags. He had been an obstacle to conspiracies that were fomenting within the army.
Finally, on October 24, in the second vote, Allende won 135 to 35 votes and was triumphantly elected. Immediately after his election he declared that any attempt to overthrow him by force of arms would be "crushed by the revolutionary violence of the masses."
On October 30 Allende announced the composition of a fifteen-member UP government, including three communists and three workers Ministers.
On November 3, 1970 Salvador Allende took office as President of Chile. In his speech after the swearing-in ceremony he said: "We strive to create a different world, we intend to prove that profound, revolutionary changes can be made.
After the glorious ceremony, Allende had ridden an open car, leading a motorcade proceeding in the streets of the center of Santiago, waving under the cheers of thick croud.
Shortly after his installation, Allende announced in a massively crowded meeting the nationalization of copper mines and foreign banks.
It is in this context that the Chilean experiment of “peaceful transition to socialism” started.
The UNIDAD POPULAR had been created on the initiative of the Communist Party of Chile in 1969. It also comprised the Socialist Party, the Radical Party, the Social Democratic Party, the Popular Unitary Action Movement (MAPU) – since 1972 the MAPU Obrero Campesino (fields laborers) splinter group too – and the Independent Popular Action . Also, since 1971 the Christian Left Party. It initially included the moderate Party of the Radical Left, that later joined opposition. Here you can find what the UP’s founding Pact was like. UP has been also supported by the Central Única de Trabajadores, a National Workers’ Syndicate.
The leader of the UP was Salvador Allende, a social democrat politician, founding member of the Socialist Party of Chile. Allende had declared that UP struggles for an anti-imperialist, anti-oligarchic government that would replace the House and Senate with a Democratic National Congress. He had been committed to undertaking a large-scale land reform against big landlords and to nationalizing all foreign firms and banks, including the huge U.S. investments in the extremely important for the Chilean economy sector of copper mining.
This program wasn’t meant to challenge capitalist ownership in general; it was meant to be applied by a bourgeois government, under capitalist rule. Nowadays the point mark of this last sentence is only holding the place where ellipsis should be standing…
The stake was a social-democratic one, in the old sense of the term: take the elections, apply radical reforms, get support at international level by the socialist movement, and gradually manage to put the foundations for a sustainable, truly democratic and socialist society.
The Communist Party of Chile abandonned its political autonomy, by passing its action exclusively through the thousands of base committees of the UP, where members of all parties of the Front were participating along with masses of people outside parties and decisions had to be unanimous. The converse is also true: the CPC had insisted on subordinating any social struggle and movement to the formal political agreement in the framework of UP’s organizations.
On September 4 1970, in the first round of the Presidential Elections, the UP got 36,3 % of the vote versus 34,9 % of its adversary. According to the Chilean Constitution, the Congress had to elect the President between the two candidates that led the vote. Yankees were already worried and thinking about alternatives. On October 5 1970, Allende, with the Christian Democrats having voted for him, got 271 votes out of 462, not enough to be elected.
At the same time, a multi-facet operation for terrorizing the people was being settled:
on 22 October the Chief of Staff, Rene Schneider had been assassinated by fascist gags. He had been an obstacle to conspiracies that were fomenting within the army.
Finally, on October 24, in the second vote, Allende won 135 to 35 votes and was triumphantly elected. Immediately after his election he declared that any attempt to overthrow him by force of arms would be "crushed by the revolutionary violence of the masses."
On October 30 Allende announced the composition of a fifteen-member UP government, including three communists and three workers Ministers.
On November 3, 1970 Salvador Allende took office as President of Chile. In his speech after the swearing-in ceremony he said: "We strive to create a different world, we intend to prove that profound, revolutionary changes can be made.
After the glorious ceremony, Allende had ridden an open car, leading a motorcade proceeding in the streets of the center of Santiago, waving under the cheers of thick croud.
Shortly after his installation, Allende announced in a massively crowded meeting the nationalization of copper mines and foreign banks.
It is in this context that the Chilean experiment of “peaceful transition to socialism” started.
TO BE CONTINUED
September 10, 2013
August 02, 2013
If you're down an' out...
let the King take care of you!
BONNES VACANCES!!
...jobseekers' bonus track (sound only)
July 09, 2013
Imperialism can be wistful sometimes
The latest military coup in Egypt stops a slide into one abyss but is hardly a guarantee that it will avoid a future one. A better future will depend on the wisdom of the kind of generals who have not proven to be very wise in the past.
The generals led by chief of the armed forces Abdul Fatah al-Sisi deposed President Mohammed Morsi, the man from the Muslim Brotherhood who was elected only a year ago. His election was the best feature of his rule, which had descended into incompetence and creeping authoritarianism.
Mr. Morsi won the election narrowly over a Mubarak-era political leftover, but he soon reinforced fears that the Brotherhood would use its new power to build an Islamist dictatorship. He tried to claim near-absolute powers by decree to force through a draft constitution written by Islamists and boycotted by everyone else.
The result was political polarization, with the opposition and military uniting against the Brotherhood supporters who were Mr. Morsi's last defenders. The millions of Egyptians who took to the streets were also protesting chronic gas and food shortages and a sinking economy. The uprising shows that the worst fate for Islamists can be to take power and thus be accountable for results. Unlike Iran in 1979, Egypt retains enough competing power centers such as a secular business class and judiciary to prevent an Islamist revolution.
Yet a military coup riding mass protests carries its own risks to future stability. One danger is the reaction of the Brotherhood, which is still the strongest single political party. The secretive group renounced armed struggle in the 1970s. But that could change if its leaders conclude that democracy works for everyone except for them.
Adly Mansour, a judge and interim president sworn in Thursday, called the Brotherhood "part of the nation." But at the same time the military closed down pro-Brotherhood TV stations and put out warrants for the arrest of the party's senior leaders. The Brotherhood is unpopular now, but as memories fade it could return to power with a vengeance if Egypt's next rulers are also unable to fix the country's many problems.
A more hopeful sign is that General Sisi gathered prominent opposition and Coptic Christian and Muslim leaders to announce a new "roadmap" for Egypt's future. The roadmap proposes, among other steps, a broadly representative committee to rewrite the constitution and to form a technocratic government.
General Sisi is also promising new elections, albeit without a timetable. Mohamed ElBaradei, a prominent (and anti-American) secular leader, and the hardline Islamic Salafist Nour Party, a rival to the Brotherhood, have publicly backed the military plan.
The generals don't seem eager to govern directly, especially after they mismanaged the transition after Hosni Mubarak's 2011 ouster until Mr. Morsi's election. Civilians were tried in military courts and abused in custody. As crime worsened and the economy stalled, public ire turned against the generals.
It will do so again without more enlightened leadership that focuses on economic revival and a political transition to a system of checks and balances. Any transition government will no doubt seek money and oil from the Gulf states as well as an early deal with the International Monetary Fund to make up for Egypt's rapidly declining currency reserves.
America can also do more than it has. The Obama Administration has been caught trailing events at every turn, supporting Mr. Mubarak before abruptly throwing him over, and then embracing Mr. Morsi despite his authoritarian turn.
President Obama stayed quiet throughout the latest crisis, finally issuing an anodyne call Wednesday night for "a democratic political order with participation from all sides and all political parties—secular and religious, civilian and military."
Mr. Obama also requested a review of U.S. aid to Egypt, but cutting that off now would be a mistake. Unpopular as America is in Egypt, $1.3 billion in annual military aid buys access with the generals. U.S. support for Cairo is written into the Camp David peace accords with Israel. Washington can also do more to help Egypt gain access to markets, international loans and investment capital. The U.S. now has a second chance to use its leverage to shape a better outcome.
Egyptians would be lucky if their new ruling generals turn out to be in the mold of Chile's Augusto Pinochet, who took power amid chaos but hired free-market reformers and midwifed a transition to democracy. If General Sisi merely tries to restore the old Mubarak order, he will eventually suffer Mr. Morsi's fate.
June 21, 2013
Καμμία πρωτοτυπία
...αντιγράφουμε σήμερα το Ν. Μπογιόπουλο (Ριζοσπάστης 21/6/2013):
Αύριο συμπληρώνεται ένας χρόνος από την ορκωμοσία της κυβέρνησης των κ.κ. Σαμαρά, Βενιζέλου, Κουβέλη.Και από εδώ:
Πριν από τη συγκρότηση της τρικομματικής τους κυβέρνησης, κατά τη διάρκεια της προεκλογικής περιόδου, οι τρεις συνιστώσες αυτής της «συνισταμένης εθνικής σωτηρίας» - όπως αποκαλεί ο Βενιζέλος τη συγκυβέρνηση - στο ενδεχόμενο να συμπράξουν μεταξύ τους και στις ερωτήσεις αν θα συγκυβερνήσουν, απαντούσαν ως εξής:
*1) «Τη συγκυβέρνηση (σ.σ.: της ΝΔ με το ΠΑΣΟΚ) τη θέλουν τριών ειδών συμφέροντα: Πρώτον, το ίδιο το ΠΑΣΟΚ. Δεύτερον, τη στηρίζουν όλα εκείνα τα συμφέροντα και οι συντεχνίες που δεν θέλουν να αλλάξει τίποτε στην Ελλάδα και, τρίτον, την προτιμούν όσοι εντός και εκτός χώρας θέλουν την αυριανή κυβέρνηση αδύναμη και ελεγχόμενη».(Αντώνης Σαμαράς, 7/4/2012)
«Δεν θέλω να συγκυβερνήσω με το ΠΑΣΟΚ και δεν συμφέρει τον ελληνικό λαό να γίνει τέτοια συγκυβέρνηση, συμφέρει μόνο το ΠΑΣΟΚ για να πέσει στα μαλακά, συμφέρει τη διαπλοκή και τα εξωθεσμικά κέντρα».
(Αντώνης Σαμαράς, 3/5/2012)
Αυτά τα έλεγε ο πρωθυπουργός. Δηλαδή, ο επικεφαλής μιας κυβέρνησης που - αν πιστέψουμε τα (προεκλογικά) λεγόμενά του - τι συγκρότησε και σε τι προΐσταται; Σε τίποτα λιγότερο από μια συγκυβέρνηση που «συμφέρει τη διαπλοκή», τα «εξωθεσμικά» και τα «εκτός χώρας κέντρα»...
*2) «Απέναντί μας λοιπόν έχουμε όχι ένα κεντροδεξιό μέτωπο, αλλά το μέτωπο της καθαρής και σκληρής δεξιάς, της "καραδεξιάς" (...) Μια συσπείρωση ακραίων στην πλειοψηφία τους στοιχείων, που επανέρχονται στην κοίτη τους στο όνομα μιας μικροπαραταξιακής επιδίωξης. Εχουμε απέναντί μας τον κ. Σαμαρά και το κόμμα του (...)».(Ευάγγελος Βενιζέλος, 25/5/2012)
Αυτά τα έλεγε ο ένας εκ των δύο στενότερων συνεργατών του κ. Σαμαρά. Ο συγκυβερνήτης του κ. Σαμαρά, ο κ. Βενιζέλος. Αυτός είναι που σήμερα αποκαλεί τη συγκυβέρνηση «συνισταμένη εθνικής σωτηρίας». Αλλά αν πιστέψουμε τα (προεκλογικά) λεγόμενά του, δεν πρόκειται για «κυβέρνηση σωτηρίας». Πρόκειται για μια σύμπραξη με την «καθαρή», τη «σκληρή δεξιά», την «καραδεξιά», των «ακραίων στην πλειοψηφία τους στοιχείων»...
*3) «Δεν θα γίνουμε το αριστερό άλλοθι της προωθούμενης συγκυβέρνησης ΠΑΣΟΚ και ΝΔ».(Φώτης Κουβέλης, 3/5/2012)
Εδώ τα σχόλια, μάλλον, είναι περιττά...
***Κατόπιν αυτών, άμα τη συμπληρώσει του ενός έτους διακυβέρνησης του τόπου από τους παραπάνω, από τους φορείς, δηλαδή,
των Πράξεων Νομοθετικού Περιεχομένου, των Προεδρικών Διαταγμάτων, των επιστρατεύσεων, του «μαύρου» στην ΕΡΤ και σε όλες τις κρατικές επιχειρήσεις που ακολουθούν, των «λουκέτων» σε σχολεία και νοσοκομεία, του καταλόγου του ξεπουλήματος που έφτασαν να περιλαμβάνει ακόμα και τον τοίχο της Καισαριανής,
δεν έχουμε παρά να αναφωνήσουμε, τρεις φορές
(μία για τον καθέναν από τους τρεις συνεπείς, αξιόπιστους, σταράτους «σωτήρες» μας):
«Ζήτω»! «Ζήτω»! «Ζήτω»!
June 13, 2013
Imperialism gettin' wacko (hi mom!)
Published in the Southern China Morning Post/Hong Kong, 13/6/2013, 3:50am local time. Story by Lana Lam.
US whistle-blower Edward Snowden yesterday emerged from hiding in Hong Kong and revealed to the South China Morning Post that he will stay in the city to fight likely attempts by his government to have him extradited for leaking state secrets.
In an exclusive interview carried out from a secret location in the city, the former Central Intelligence Agency analyst also made explosive claims that the US government had been hacking into computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland for years.
At Snowden’s request we cannot divulge details about how the interview was conducted.
A week since revelations that the US has been secretly collecting phone and online data of its citizens, he said he will stay in the city “until I am asked to leave”, adding: “I have had many opportunities to flee HK, but I would rather stay and fight the US government in the courts, because I have faith in HK’s rule of law.”
In a frank hour-long interview, the 29-year-old, who US authorities have confirmed is now the subject of a criminal case, said he was neither a hero nor a traitor and that:
Snowden has been in Hong Kong since May 20 when he fled his home in Hawaii to take refuge here, a move which has been questioned by many who believe the city cannot protect him.
“People who think I made a mistake in picking HK as a location misunderstand my intentions. I am not here to hide from justice, I am here to reveal criminality,” he said. Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said.
One of the targets in the SAR, according to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking activity by the NSA against mainland targets. Snowden believed there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland. “We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” he said.
“Last week the American government happily operated in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but no longer. Every level of society is demanding accountability and oversight.” Snowden said he was releasing the information to demonstrate “the hypocrisy of the US government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries”.
“Not only does it do so, but it is so afraid of this being known that it is willing to use any means, such as diplomatic intimidation, to prevent this information from becoming public.” Since the shocking revelations a week ago, Snowden has been vilified as a defector but also hailed by supporters such as WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange. “I’m neither traitor nor hero. I’m an American,” he said, adding that he was proud to be an American. “I believe in freedom of expression. I acted in good faith but it is only right that the public form its own opinion.”
Snowden said he had not contacted his family and feared for their safety as well as his own. “I will never feel safe. “Things are very difficult for me in all terms, but speaking truth to power is never without risk,” he said. “It has been difficult, but I have been glad to see the global public speak out against these sorts of systemic violations of privacy. “All I can do is rely on my training and hope that world governments will refuse to be bullied by the United States into persecuting people seeking political refuge.”
Asked if he had been offered asylum by the Russian government, he said: “My only comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be intimidated by great power”. The interview comes on the same day NSA chief General Keith Alexander appeared before Congress to defend his agency over the leaks. It was his first appearance since the explosive revelations were made last week. Alexander’s prepared remarks did not specifically address revelations about the Prism program.
Snowden's revelations threaten to test new attempts to build US-Sino bridges after a weekend summit in California between the nations' presidents, Barack Obama and Xi Jinping. If true, Snowden's allegations lend credence to China's longstanding position that it is as much a victim of hacking as a perpetrator, after Obama pressed Xi to rein in cyber-espionage by the Chinese military.
Tens of thousands of Snowden’s supporters have signed a petition calling for his pardon in the United States while many have donated money to a fund to help him. “I’m very grateful for the support of the public,” he said. “But I ask that they act in their interest – save their money for letters to the government that breaks the law and claims it noble.
“The reality is that I have acted at great personal risk to help the public of the world, regardless of whether that public is American, European, or Asian.”
The US consulate in Hong Kong could not be contacted yesterday on a public holiday.
29-year-old American Edward Snowden, a contract employee at the National Security Agency, is the whistleblower behind significant revelations that surfaced in June 2013 about the US government's top secret, extensive domestic surveillance programmes. Snowden flew to Hong Kong from Hawaii in May 2013, and supplied confidential US government documents to media outlets including the Guardian.
Edward Snowden: US government has been hacking Hong Kong and China for years
Former CIA operative makes more explosive claims and says Washington is ‘bullying’ Hong Kong to extradite himUS whistle-blower Edward Snowden yesterday emerged from hiding in Hong Kong and revealed to the South China Morning Post that he will stay in the city to fight likely attempts by his government to have him extradited for leaking state secrets.
In an exclusive interview carried out from a secret location in the city, the former Central Intelligence Agency analyst also made explosive claims that the US government had been hacking into computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland for years.
At Snowden’s request we cannot divulge details about how the interview was conducted.
A week since revelations that the US has been secretly collecting phone and online data of its citizens, he said he will stay in the city “until I am asked to leave”, adding: “I have had many opportunities to flee HK, but I would rather stay and fight the US government in the courts, because I have faith in HK’s rule of law.”In a frank hour-long interview, the 29-year-old, who US authorities have confirmed is now the subject of a criminal case, said he was neither a hero nor a traitor and that:
- US National Security Agency’s controversial Prism programme extends to people and institutions in Hong Kong and mainland China;
- The US is exerting “bullying’’ diplomatic pressure on Hong Kong to extradite him;
- Hong Kong’s rule of law will protect him from the US;
- He is in constant fear for his own safety and that of his family.
Snowden has been in Hong Kong since May 20 when he fled his home in Hawaii to take refuge here, a move which has been questioned by many who believe the city cannot protect him.
“People who think I made a mistake in picking HK as a location misunderstand my intentions. I am not here to hide from justice, I am here to reveal criminality,” he said. Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said.
One of the targets in the SAR, according to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking activity by the NSA against mainland targets. Snowden believed there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland. “We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,” he said.
“Last week the American government happily operated in the shadows with no respect for the consent of the governed, but no longer. Every level of society is demanding accountability and oversight.” Snowden said he was releasing the information to demonstrate “the hypocrisy of the US government when it claims that it does not target civilian infrastructure, unlike its adversaries”.
“Not only does it do so, but it is so afraid of this being known that it is willing to use any means, such as diplomatic intimidation, to prevent this information from becoming public.” Since the shocking revelations a week ago, Snowden has been vilified as a defector but also hailed by supporters such as WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange. “I’m neither traitor nor hero. I’m an American,” he said, adding that he was proud to be an American. “I believe in freedom of expression. I acted in good faith but it is only right that the public form its own opinion.”
Snowden said he had not contacted his family and feared for their safety as well as his own. “I will never feel safe. “Things are very difficult for me in all terms, but speaking truth to power is never without risk,” he said. “It has been difficult, but I have been glad to see the global public speak out against these sorts of systemic violations of privacy. “All I can do is rely on my training and hope that world governments will refuse to be bullied by the United States into persecuting people seeking political refuge.”
Asked if he had been offered asylum by the Russian government, he said: “My only comment is that I am glad there are governments that refuse to be intimidated by great power”. The interview comes on the same day NSA chief General Keith Alexander appeared before Congress to defend his agency over the leaks. It was his first appearance since the explosive revelations were made last week. Alexander’s prepared remarks did not specifically address revelations about the Prism program.
Snowden's revelations threaten to test new attempts to build US-Sino bridges after a weekend summit in California between the nations' presidents, Barack Obama and Xi Jinping. If true, Snowden's allegations lend credence to China's longstanding position that it is as much a victim of hacking as a perpetrator, after Obama pressed Xi to rein in cyber-espionage by the Chinese military.
Tens of thousands of Snowden’s supporters have signed a petition calling for his pardon in the United States while many have donated money to a fund to help him. “I’m very grateful for the support of the public,” he said. “But I ask that they act in their interest – save their money for letters to the government that breaks the law and claims it noble.
“The reality is that I have acted at great personal risk to help the public of the world, regardless of whether that public is American, European, or Asian.”
The US consulate in Hong Kong could not be contacted yesterday on a public holiday.
April 05, 2013
Imperialism has always been dangerous to mankind
Reflections of Fidel
The duty to avoid a war in Korea
(Taken from CubaDebate)
The duty to avoid a war in Korea
(Taken from CubaDebate)
A few days ago I mentioned the great challenges humanity is currently facing. Intelligent life emerged on our planet approximately 200,000 years ago, although new discoveries demonstrate something else.
This is not to confuse intelligent
life with the existence of life which, from its
elemental forms in our solar system, emerged
millions of years ago.
A virtually infinite number of life
forms exist. In the sophisticated work of the world’s
most eminent scientists the idea has already been
conceived of reproducing the sounds which followed
the Big Bang, the great explosion which took place
more than 13.7 billion years ago.
This introduction would be too
extensive if it was not to explain the gravity of an
event as unbelievable and absurd as the situation
created in the Korean Peninsula, within a geographic
area containing close to five billion of the seven
billion persons currently inhabiting the planet.
This is about one of the most
serious dangers of nuclear war since the October
Crisis around Cuba in 1962, 50 years ago.
In 1950, a war was unleashed there [the
Korean Peninsula] which cost millions of lives. It
came barely five years after two atomic bombs were
exploded over the defenseless cities of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki which, in a matter of seconds, killed
and irradiated hundreds of thousands of people.
General Douglas MacArthur wanted to
utilize atomic weapons against the Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea. Not even Harry Truman allowed
that.
It has been affirmed that the People’s
Republic of China lost one million valiant soldiers
in order to prevent the installation of an enemy
army on that country’s border with its homeland. For
its part, the Soviet army provided weapons, air
support, technological and economic aid.
I had the honor of meeting Kim Il
Sung, a historic figure, notably courageous and
revolutionary.
If war breaks out there, the peoples
of both parts of the Peninsula will be terribly
sacrificed, without benefit to all or either of them.
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was always
friendly with Cuba, as Cuba has always been and will
continue to be with her.
Now that the country has
demonstrated its technical and scientific
achievements, we remind her of her duties to the
countries which have been her great friends, and it
would be unjust to forget that such a war would
particularly affect more than 70% of the population
of the planet.
If a conflict of that nature should
break out there, the government of Barack Obama in
his second mandate would be buried in a deluge of
images which would present him as the most sinister
character in the history of the United States. The
duty of avoiding war is also his and that of the
people of the United States.
April 02, 2013
Imperialism has always been ruthless
...a letter for remembering
Published here
Referring to the controversy surrounding the death of Patrice Lumumba in1960, Bernard Porter quotes Calder Walton’s conclusion: ‘The question remains whether British plots to assassinate Lumumba … ever amounted to anything. At present, we do not know’ (LRB, 21 March). Actually, in this particular case, I can report that we do.
It so happens that I was having a cup of tea with Daphne Park – we were colleagues from opposite sides of the Lords – a few months before she died in March 2010. She had been consul and first secretary in Leopoldville, now Kinshasa, from 1959 to 1961, which in practice (this was subsequently acknowledged) meant head of MI6 there. I mentioned the uproar surrounding Lumumba’s abduction and murder, and recalled the theory that MI6 might have had something to do with it. ‘We did,’ she replied, ‘I organised it.’
It so happens that I was having a cup of tea with Daphne Park – we were colleagues from opposite sides of the Lords – a few months before she died in March 2010. She had been consul and first secretary in Leopoldville, now Kinshasa, from 1959 to 1961, which in practice (this was subsequently acknowledged) meant head of MI6 there. I mentioned the uproar surrounding Lumumba’s abduction and murder, and recalled the theory that MI6 might have had something to do with it. ‘We did,’ she replied, ‘I organised it.’
We went on to discuss her contention that Lumumba would have handed over the whole lot to the Russians: the high-value Katangese uranium deposits as well as the diamonds and other important minerals largely located in the secessionist eastern state of Katanga. Against that, I put the point that I didn’t see how suspicion of Western involvement and of our motivation for Balkanising their country would be a happy augury for the new republic’s peaceful development.
David Lea
London SW1
London SW1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












